|
The Messenger of Allah, upon whom be peace, said:
"Allah will not hold anyone of this nation responsible for what
is done by mistake . . ."
'Abdurrazaq related that Mamar reported from al-Amash that Zaid
ibn Wahb said: "The people broke their fast during the time of 'Umar ibn
al-Khattab. I saw a big pot being brought from Hafsah's house
and the people drank. Then the sun appeared from behind
the clouds and this distressed the people. They said: 'We have
to make up this day.' 'Umar asked: 'Why? By Allah, we have not
involved ourselves in any sin.' "
Al-Bukhari records that Asma' bint Abu Bakr said: "We broke the
fast of Ramadan when it was cloudy during the time of the
Prophet, and then the sun appeared again."Commenting on the
subject, Ibn Taimiyyah says: "This points to two things:
1.
That it is not preferred for one to delay breaking the fast
until one is absolutely certain that the sun has set . . .
and
2.
That it is not necessary to make up such a day. If the
Prophet would have ordered them to make up that day, it
would have become public knowledge. The fact that it has
been related that they broke their fast [and that it has not
been related that they were ordered to make up that day]
points to the fact that they were not ordered to make up
that day."
The only action, according to most scholars, which requires that
both the day be made up and the act of expiation be performed,
is having sexual intercourse during a day of Ramadan.
Abu Hurairah reported that a man came to the Messenger of Allah
and said: "I am destroyed, O Messenger of Allah!"
The Prophet asked:
"What has destroyed you?"
He said,
"I had intercourse with my wife during a day of Ramadan." The
Prophet asked:
"Are you able to free a slave?"
He said, "No".
The Prophet asked:
"Is it possible for you to fast for two consecutive months?"
He said, "No." The Prophet asked:
"Is it possible for you to feed sixty poor people?"
He said, "No." The Prophet said:
"Then sit."
A basket of dates was brought to the Prophet and he said to the
man:
Give this in charity.
The man said: "To someone poorer than us? There is no one
in this city that is poorer than us!" The Prophet laughed until
his molar teeth could be seen and said:
"Go and feed your family with it." This
is related by the group.
Most scholars say that both men and women have to perform the
acts of expiation if they intentionally have intercourse during
a day of Ramadan on which they had intended to fast. If they had
intercourse out of forgetfulness or not due to choice--that is,
due to coercion, or they did not have the intention to fast,
then the expiation is not obligatory on either one of them. If
the woman was forced to have intercourse by the man, the
expiation will be obligatory only upon the man.
According to ash-Shafi’i, the expiation is not obligatory upon
the woman in any case--that is, regardless if it was due to
choice or coercion, and she need only make up the day of fasting
that she voided. An-Nawawi says: "The most authentic opinion, in
general, is that the expiation is obligatory upon the man only
and that there is nothing upon the woman. There is nothing
obligatory on her in relation to this matter, as it is a matter
of [paying] money [due to something related to] sexual
intercourse and this refers to the duty of the man and not the
woman. [In this way,] it is similar to the case of dowry."
Abu Dawud says: "Ahmad was asked about someone who had sex
during Ramadan: 'Is there any expiation upon the woman?'
He said: 'I have not heard of any.' "In al-Mughni it is stated:
"This refers to the fact that the Prophet ordered the man who
had had sexual intercourse to free a slave. He did not order the
woman to do anything, although he obviously knew that she was a
partner in the act."
According to most scholars, acts of expiation must be performed
in the order that was mentioned in the hadith. The first command
is to free a slave. If this is not possible, the person is to
fast for two consecutive months. If that is not possible, the
person is to feed sixty poor people with meals that are similar
to an average meal in his household. The person cannot jump from
one act to another unless he is not able to perform the prior
order commanded. According to the Malikiyyah and a narration
from Ahmad, the person is free to choose any of the above three
acts and that will be sufficient for him.
This latter opinion is based on the report from Malik and Ibn
Juraij on the authority of Humaid ibn 'Abdurrahman who reported
that Abu Hurairah narrated that a man broke his fast during
Ramadan and the Prophet ordered him, as an expiation, to free a
slave or fast two months consecutively or to feed sixty poor
people. This is related by Muslim.
In the preceding hadith, the word "or" implies choice, but
according to some, the reason for the expiation to be performed
was different and therefore the person could choose, as in the
case of the expiation for breaking an oath. Ash-Shaukani says:
"In the different narrations, there is evidence that the
expiation is to be performed in order or according to one's
choice. Those who relate it to be in order are more in number.
Al-Muhallab and al-Qurtubi combined the narrations and said that
the event [of someone breaking the fast] occurred more than
once."
Al-Haafidh differs: "This is not correct. It was just one event
and the parts are all united. So the crux of the matter is that
there was not more than one event. Some combine the reports and
say that following the order is preferred, but that one may
choose. Others say the opposite."
Whoever has sexual intercourse (with his wife) on a day of
Ramadan and, before he performs the act of expiation, has
intercourse on another day of Ramadan, need only perform one act
of expiation according to a narration from Ahmad and the
Hanafiyyah. This is because there is a punishment for acts that
are repeated, and if the expiation or punishment is not carried
out, all the acts are taken together as one. According to Malik,
ash-Shafi’i, and Ahmad, the person must perform the expiation
twice, as each day of Ramadan is a separate act of worship. If
the expiation is obligatory because the person voided the fast,
the separate acts are not combined together.
All scholars agree that if the person intentionally had
intercourse during a day of Ramadan, has performed the
expiation, and then has intercourse on another day of Ramadan,
and then another expiation becomes obligatory upon him.
Similarly, they are in agreement that if one has intercourse
twice during a day, before performing the expiation for the
first act, then he need only perform one act of expiation. If he
has performed the expiation for the first one, then he need not
perform an act of expiation for the second, according to most
scholars. Ahmad says that in such a case, he must perform a
total of two acts of expiation.
|