|
Actions that Void the Fast
The actions that void the fast may be divided into two types:
1.
those which void the fast and require that the day be made up
later, and
2. those
which void the fast and, in addition to being made up, also
require an act of expiation.
Intentional eating or drinking
If one eats due to forgetfulness, a mistake, or coercion, then
he does not have to make up the day later or perform any
expiation. Abu Hurairah reported that the Prophet said:
"Whoever forgets he is fasting, and eats or drinks is to
complete his fast, as it was Allah who fed him and gave
him something to drink."
This is related by the group.
Commenting on it, at-Tirmidhi says: "Most of the scholars act
according to this hadith. It is the opinion of Sufyan ath-Thauri,
ash-Shaf'i, Ahrnad, and Ishaq."
Abu Hanifah reported that the Prophet said:
"Whoever breaks his fast during Ramadan due to forgetfulness is
not to make up the day later or to perform any expiation."
This is related by ad-Daraqutni, al-Baihaqi, and al-Hakim, who
say that it is sahih according to Muslim's criterion. Ibn Hajr
says that its chain is sahih.
Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said:
"Allah will not hold anyone of this nation responsible for what
is done in error, forgetfulness or under coercion."
This is recounted by Ibn Majah, at-Tabarani, and al-Hakim.
Fasting, intentional vomiting
If one is overcome and vomits unintentionally, he does not have
to make up the day later on or perform the acts of expiation.
Abu Hurairah reported that the Prophet, upon whom be peace,
said:
"Whoever is overcome and vomits is not to make up the day."
Whoever vomits intentionally must make up the day."
This is related by Ahmad, Abu Dawud, at-Tirmidhi, Ibn
Majah, Ibn Hibban, ad-Daraqutni, and al-Hakim. The latter called
it sahih.
Of the report's credibility, al-Khattabi says: "I do not know of
any difference of opinion among the scholars on this point. If
one vomits unintentionally he is not in need of making up the
day, while one who vomits intentionally must make up the day
later."
Fasting, the menses and post-childbirth bleeding
Even if such bleeding begins just before the sunset, the fast of
that day is rendered void and the day must be made up. There is
a consensus of scholars on this point.
Fasting, ejaculation of sperm
Ejaculation voids the fast even if it was just due to kissing,
hugging, or masturbation, and the day must be made up. If the
ejaculation was due to looking at or thinking about something,
then it is like having a wet dream during the day and it,
therefore, does not void the fast nor is there
any requirement on the person. Similarly, ejaculation of seminal
fluid does not harm the fast in any way.
Eating something that is not nourishing, such as salt
Someone who uses a lot of salt for a reason other than eating,
in which it goes down to the stomach, breaks the fast according
to most scholars.
If one has the intention, while he is fasting, to break the
fast, he in effect voids the fast even if he does not actually
eat anything: This is because the intention is one of the
pillars of the fast and, if one changes his intention, he has
nullified his fast.
If one eats, drinks, or has intercourse, thinking that the sun
has set or that fajr has not occurred:
In such cases, according to most scholars and the four imams,
that person is to make up that day. However, there is a
difference of opinion on this point. Ishaq, Dawud, Ibn Hazm,
'Ata, 'Urwah, al-Hassan al-Basri, and Mujahid maintain that such
a fast is sound and that the person need not
make up the day later. They base their opinion on the fact that
Allah says in the Qur'an:
"And there is no sin for you in the mistakes you make
unintentionally, but what your hearts purpose [that will be a
sin for you]."
Unintentional mistakes
The Messenger of Allah, upon whom be peace, said:
"Allah will not hold anyone of this nation responsible for what
is done by mistake . . ."
'Abdurrazaq related that Mamar reported from al-Amash that Zaid
ibn Wahb said: "The people broke their fast during the time of 'Umar
ibn al-Khattab. I saw a big pot being brought from Hafsah's
house and the people drank. Then the sun appeared from behind
the clouds and this distressed the people. They said: 'We have
to make up this day.' 'Umar asked: 'Why? By Allah, we have not
involved ourselves in any sin.' "
Al-Bukhari records that Asma' bint Abu Bakr said: "We broke the
fast of Ramadan when it was cloudy during the time of the
Prophet, and then the sun appeared again."
Commenting on the subject, Ibn Taimiyyah says: "This points to
two things:
1.
that it is not preferred for one to delay breaking the fast
until one is absolutely certain that the sun has set . . . and
2.
that it is not necessary to make up such a day. If the Prophet
would
have ordered them to make up that day, it would have become
public knowledge. The fact that it has been related that they
broke their fast [and that it has not been related that they
were ordered to make up that day] points to the fact that they
were not ordered to make up that day."
The only action, according to most scholars, which requires that
both the day be made up and the act of expiation be performed,
is having sexual intercourse during a day of Ramadan.
Abu Hurairah reported that a man came to the Messenger of Allah
and said:
"I am destroyed, O Messenger of Allah!" The Prophet asked: "What
has destroyed you?" He said, "I had intercourse with my wife
during a day of Ramadan." The Prophet asked: "Are you able to
free a slave?" He said, "No". The Prophet asked: "Is it possible
for you to fast for two consecutive months?" He said, "No." The
Prophet asked: "Is it possible for you to feed sixty poor
people?" He said, "No." The Prophet said: "Then sit." A basket
of dates was brought to the Prophet and he said to the man: Give
this in charity. The man said: "To someone poorer than us? There
is no one in this city that is poorer than us!" The Prophet
laughed until his molar teeth could be seen and said: "Go and
feed your family with it."
This is related by the group.
Most scholars say that both men and women have to perform the
acts of expiation if they intentionally have intercourse during
a day of Ramadan on which they had intended to fast. If they had
intercourse out of forgetfulness or not due to choice--that is,
due to coercion, or they
did not have the intention to fast, then the expiation is not
obligatory on either one of them. If the woman was forced to
have intercourse by the man, the expiation will be obligatory
only upon the man.
According to ash-Shaf'i, the expiation is not obligatory upon
the woman in any case--that is, regardless if it was due to
choice or coercion, and she need only make up the day of fasting
that she voided. An-Nawawi says: "The most authentic opinion, in
general, is that the expiation is obligatory upon the man only
and that there is nothing upon the woman. There is nothing
obligatory on her in relation to this matter, as it is a matter
of [paying] money [due to something related to] sexual
intercourse and this refers to the duty of the man and not the
woman. [In this way,] it is similar to the case of dowry."
Abu Dawud says: "Ahmad was asked about someone who had sex
during Ramadan: 'Is there any expiation upon the woman?' He
said: 'I have not heard of any.' "In al-Mughni it is stated:
"This refers to the fact that the Prophet ordered the man who
had had sexual intercourse to free a slave. He did not order the
woman to do anything, although he obviously knew that she was a
partner in the act."
According to most scholars, acts of expiation must be performed
in the order that was mentioned in the hadith. The first command
is to free a slave. If this is not possible, the person is to
fast for two consecutive months. If that is not possible, the
person is to feed sixty poor people with meals that are similar
to an average meal in his household. The person cannot jump from
one act to another unless he is not able to perform the prior
order commanded. According to the Malikiyyah and a narration
from Ahmad, the person is free to choose any of the above three
acts and that will be sufficient for him.
This latter opinion is based on the report from Malik and Ibn
Juraij on the authority of Humaid ibn 'Abdurrahman who reported
that Abu Hurairah narrated that a man broke his fast during
Ramadan and the Prophet ordered him, as an expiation, to free a
slave or fast two months consecutively or to feed sixty poor
people. This is related by Muslim.
In the preceding hadith, the word "or" implies choice, but
according to some, the reason for the expiation to be performed
was different and therefore the person could choose, as in the
case of the expiation for breaking an oath. Ash-Shaukani says:
"In the different narrations, there is evidence that the
expiation is to be performed in order or according to one's
choice. Those who relate it to be in order are more in number.
Al-Muhallab and al-Qurtubi combined the narrations and said that
the event [of someone breaking the fast] occurred more than
once."
Al-Hafidh differs: "This is not correct. It was just one event
and the parts are all united. So the crux of the matter is that
there was not more than one event. Some combine the reports and
say that following the order is preferred, but that one may
choose. Others say the opposite."
Whoever has sexual intercourse (with his wife) on a day of
Ramadan and, before he performs the act of expiation, has
intercourse on another day of Ramadan, need only perform one act
of expiation according to a narration from Ahmad and the
Hanafiyyah. This is because there is a punishment for acts that
are repeated, and if the expiation or punishment is not carried
out, all the acts are taken together as one. According to Malik,
ash-Shaf'i, and Ahmad, the person must perform the expiation
twice, as each day of Ramadan is a separate act of worship. If
the expiation is obligatory because the person voided the fast,
the separate acts are not combined together.
All scholars agree that if the person intentionally had
intercourse during a day of Ramadan and has performed the
expiation and then has intercourse on another day of Ramadan,
then another expiation becomes obligatory upon him. Similarly,
they are in agreement that if one has intercourse twice during a
day, before performing the expiation for the first act, then he
need only perform one act of expiation. If he has performed the
expiation for the first one, then he need not perform an act of
expiation for the second, according to most scholars. Ahmad says
that in such a case, he must perform a total of two acts of
expiation.
|